Happy Communism Day

Happy Communist Day, Liberals.

Happy Communist Day, Liberals.

Happy Communism Day, Liberals.  Today is your day to party… to Communist Party, that is.

Labor Day was started in this country like 100 years ago when some Union Thugs were acting up, striking and rioting and generally being ungrateful to the job creators who so kindly allowed them to be alive. So these Union Terrorists basically got themselves in some trouble and some of them died or whatever, and so the wimpy liberal government at the time decided to “honor” them by declaring a day to celebrate “workers” and the so-called “labor movement.” What a bunch of hogwash.

So basically it’s a leftist, socialist anti-success holiday.  It perpetuates corrupting liberal values.  Republicans getting banned from parades.  People not being allowed to wear white.  NOT ALLOWED TO WEAR WHITE. See how racist liberals try to control every aspect of your life?

If you are a union thug, you probably like Labor Day. Well, you know who else probably liked Labor Day?  Hitler.  Think about that.

So today, if you want to be a Real American, try celebrating “Labor Day” by being thankful that there are sweet, kind, generous rich people out there who care enough about your “Labor” to give you a little money once in a while.

That’s the true Conservative Way.



Shared prosperity has a liberal bias!

Unions and Economic Inequality

The bias in this graph is not with the data, but with the title. The actual data here is not biased, in fact: the data is great. It is wonderful. The actual data itself shows that conservatives are right about everything and that if only everyone adopted the conservative view then we would live in a perfect world.

What this graph clearly shows is that when union membership is high, people who work hard and do a good job in business are not rewarded as much as they could be. On the other hand, when union membership decreases, the people who work hard and do a good job in business are rewarded more for the wonderful, fantastic things that they do.

But the title and labels in the graph are horrifically biased, and skewed to somehow make it seem like success is actually bad.

THAT’S RIGHT I SAID IT!  Liberals think that success is bad.

The red line in the graph is labelled “share of income going to the top 10%.”  What it should really say is “the amount that we reward people for doing good deeds.”  Liberals want to use the extremely biased term “top 10%” to cause resentment and class warfare. But think about it: How did they get to be the top 10%?  By being successful, working hard, and being good at their jobs, obviously! Therefore, the label “top 10%” should be replaced with “awesome people who deserve lots of stuff.”

Moreover, the title of the graph uses the term “shared prosperity.” This is a nonsense term.  I suspect it is a  synonym for “communism” and “socialism” and “Hitler” and all of those other words that are essentially interchangeable. Cuba. Hip-hop Barbeque. You get the idea.

When people say “shared prosperity” they are trying to get you to think it is a good thing. Liberals who don’t think very hard about things see the word “share” and it makes them feel good, and they see the word “prosperity” and it makes them feel good, so they think “shared prosperity” is a good thing.

But you and I know better, don’t we? We know that anyone who “shares” their prosperity is just enabling lazy poor people to sit around and do nothing all day at the expense of the successful millionaires who actually deserve to have money.

Anyone who tells you anything else is just spewing liberal bias!!!!


Graph Data Source: Jon Melegrito’s analysis of Historical Statistics of the United States, unitedstates.com, Piketty and Saez, 2003, and The World Top Incomes Database
Graph Found Via: AFSCME.org


Job loss statistics show liberal bias!

Liberal Job Loss Stats

I am always hearing from reliable right-wing sources that unions and collective bargaining kill jobs. Yet somehow states that are “right to work” (no evil unions) have lost just as many jobs, if not more, than states that have free collective bargaining (evil unions).

Why would states without unions be losing so many jobs? It is clearly a conspiracy caused by liberal bias!!!

Source: Public Citizen (2011)
Via: epi.org

State deficits have a liberal bias!

Liberal Deficits

Everybody knows that the only way to balance a budget is to destroy unions. In state after state, governors have put forward good conservative plans to balance the budget by getting rid of unions.

Yet somehow, this graph shows that there is no relationship between union membership and state deficits. The fit line is essentially flat, and with no significant correlation (p=0.21).

Since good conservative common sense tells us that unions should sap money from government, there is only one explanation: these state deficits must have a liberal bias!!

source: data from CBPP and BLS, graph by John Sides

Middle-class income has a liberal bias!

Liberal Middle Class Income

It is a well-known and highly proven fact that unions destroy the free market system and make angels cry. States that do not have unions are more free and prosperous in every way.

So how is it possible that middle-class income actually was higher when union membership was higher, and has gone down as union membership has gone down?


It is obvious what is happening here. Middle class income is engaged in a conspiracy with liberal socialist union members to make good, freedom-loving capitalists look bad. This is clearly a case of the middle-class incomes having liberal bias!!!!


Source: Center for American Progress
Via: Rachel Maddow Blog