LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351
Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Wisconsin job growth has a liberal bias!

Published on May 17, 2013 by in Graphs

Wisconsin job growth

Wisconsin is a shining conservative city on a hill, and has been implementing severely conservative policies for several years now. So why isn’t job growth as high as conservatives say it should be?

Take a quick look at the recent history of Wisconsin.  When Scott Walker was inaugurated as governor, it meant that the Republican Party finally had complete control of the state: Republican governor, Republican Assembly, and Republican State Senate.  Yippee!

Immediately, he got to work. Walker refused money from the federal government for building high-speed rail. He cut education funding. He destroyed unions. He signed a Voter ID law that would make it more difficult for people to vote. He turned away federal money for health care reform.

Now, sure, some people did some grousing, and Walker barely survived a recall election.  But all of that is ok! Why?

Because of what was in his heart. The only reason he did all of these unpopular things was to create jobs! 

You see, sometimes tough decisions have to be made. Scott Walker knew that some of his decisions would be unpopular, but he also knew: all of these things will boost job growth.

Refusing money for highspeed rail and health care reform… well, that will obviously create jobs.  Duh.

Destroying unions…. well, that might not help union jobs, but nobody cares about those anyway.

And making it harder for people to vote…. well, we’re pretty dang certain that that is supposed to create jobs, too!!

So what is wrong with the above graph?

Why has Wisconsin consistently plummeted in job growth to be last in the national rankings?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, STUPID JOB GROWTH? HAVEN’T YOU HEARD OF CONSERVATIVE IDEALS??

Clearly, if all of Wisconsin’s conservative job-creating efforts have actually lead to a decrease in job growth, it can’t be because conservative economic beliefs are wrong.

Oh no. Anything but that.

You know what it’s got to be: …. liberal bias!!!

 

graph data source: QCEW data from the BLS
graph found via: The Daily Kos

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Job recoveries have a liberal bias!

Published on May 3, 2013 by in Graphs

Private Sector Jobs under Bush and Obama

Everyone knows Obama’s job recovery is the most sluggish job recovery in the history of all of humanity, and probably the whole galaxy. So why does this graph show that Bush’s job recovery was even worse?

Some of you might remember that George W. Bush’s first term as president immediately followed a big stock market bust, just as Barack Obama’s first term immediately followed the housing bust.  Although both busts were different, both lead to dramatic job losses that then rebounded.

And according to the above graph, the recovery of private sector jobs during Obama’s presidency was much faster than the recovery under George W. Bush’s presidency!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU STUPID RECOVERY? HAVEN’T YOU HEARD OBAMA IS DESTROYING EVERYTHING?

We’ve heard repeatedly from our conservative leaders that this economic recovery is worst, most sluggish recovery ever since the beginning of time plus a million.  Why is it that we don’t remember the same comments being made during Bush’s term as president?

Some people might point out that the recovery seemed better under Bush because Republicans under Bush allowed private sector jobs to increase, while under Obama they have slashed government jobs as much as possible.

But do not listen to those people. Everyone knows that “government jobs” don’t count. That would just be liberal bias!!!

 

graph found via: Calculated Risk Blog

an update to: You should believe it’s a non-recovery because I say so
related post: Hannity’s rubber band has a liberal bias!

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Liberally biased recession punishes conservatives!

unemployment and education

This disturbing graph shows that the recession has had a very partisan and unfair liberal bias. Specifically: the more indoctrinated you are by liberal education, the less likely you are to be unemployed.

It’s important to remember the conservative values that the Republican party has championed for the last several years. Universities are nothing more than liberal indoctrination camps. Real conservatives all home-school their children. Anyone who says that children should all have a chance to go to college is being an elitist liberal snob. These are all basic and unquestionable facts.

That is why it is so upsetting to see graphs like the one above. According to the graph above, the more education a person has—and remember that means the more they have been indoctrinated by the Liberal Machine—the less likely a person is to be unemployed!

Even worse: during recessions, layoffs are disproportionately focused on people who have rejected liberal elitist so-called “education”.

Is it possible that people without “educations” have fewer skills and therefore are less valuable in the free market workplace? NO!

That is what liberals want you to believe.

But that would imply that higher education is somehow… good. That clearly contradicts what our Republican leaders have been telling us.

There is only one explanation. The evil liberals who control our government have found a way to manipulate the free market so that they are disproportionately PUNISHING conservatives who refuse to participate in the liberal “education” scam by getting them fired.

Anyone who tells you anything else is clearly just fooled by liberal bias!!!

 

graph source: Calculated Risk Blog

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

Obama’s God-like control over jobs

This is the third installment of the new monthly column, The Illuminated Truth.


If there is one thing that conservatives know for a fact, it is that Obama has completely unprecedented and almost unimaginable power. He can control gas prices with the wave of a hand, he can control the number of private-sector jobs that get created a month before an election, and he can even control the weather.

So given all of that, this graph opens up a number of important and very suspicious questions.

The REAL Obama Jobs PlanIf you look at the recent trend-line of job creation, and extrapolate forward, jobs will reach the point of “full recovery” exactly in time for the 2016 election season!

Doesn’t that seem a little bit convenient to be a coincidence?

Now, let’s examine the evidence a little bit further.  Job fluctuations have been erratic during almost this entire recovery. Doesn’t it seem like this is unusual? When you think back to previous recoveries, doesn’t it seem like they have generally shown a gradual and continuous improvement as things got better?  Sure it does.

So why is this recovery different?  Many good, rational conservative pundits have put forth a number of theories. Some have suggested that Obama wants to completely destroy the economy, others have suggested that he’s trying to artificially make jobs improve faster just to make himself look good.  But there is another option that is much darker and more sinister than that.

That third option is this: Obama is, behind the curtain, personally manipulating the rate of the job recovery so that it is not too fast, and no too slow…. but will perfectly coincide with the next election!

He is basically setting up the economic environment to try to ensure a Democrat victory in the next Presidential election.

Does Obama really have the power to exercise such exact control over jobs in the private sector that he can time the economy to reach complete recovery to within months of the next Presidential election?

Well, look at the above graph. Isn’t that exactly what seems to be happening?

Trust us.  After all, you can’t doubt your own eyes.

 

graph data source: Federal Reserve Economic Data
graph found via: economicpopulist.org

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Liberal facts conspire to embarass the Heritage Foundation

Heritage Foundation vs Liberal Data

When liberal facts and numbers dare to embarrass good, conservative institutions like the Heritage Foundation, it’s just downright unseemly.

The above graphs provide a good example of this kind of scummy behavior that liberal facts like to engage in.

On the left you see two graphs that were published by the Heritage Foundation in 2001 as predictions of the miraculous panacea the Bush Tax Cuts would be over the following ten years, from 2001 to 2011. The top graph shows the prediction that the Bush Tax Cuts would produce a veritable explosion of tax revenues from 2001 to 2011. The bottom graph shows the prediction that the Bush Tax Cuts would cause a virtual orgasm of jobs during that same period. Together, these graph proved that the Bush Tax Cuts would be better than sex and solve all of our economic woes.

On the right, you have graphs that show what actually happened in the years 2001-2011. Revenue plummeted, unemployment skyrocketed. In other words: everything turned out pretty much the opposite of what the Heritage Foundation predicted.

How embarrassing.

Obviously, there is something seriously wrong here. The Heritage Foundation are good people. They are doing the best they can. It’s just not fair for facts and actual data to make them look so very, very pathetically inept. It’s just not nice for real statistics to somehow give the impression that the Heritage Foundation is made up of a bunch of yahoos that have absolutely no clue what they are talking about and couldn’t predict themselves out of a paper bag.

So obviously, as usual, it must be the facts that are wrong. The reality of the situation is, the Bush Tax Cuts would have done exactly what the Heritage Foundation predicted, if it were not for the unexpected circumstances that arose, including a black president, and of course lots and lots of liberal bias!!!!

graph data source: The Heritage Foundation 2001, Associated Press, and US Bureau of Labor Statistics
graph found via: “How Awesome The Bush Tax Cuts Were Supposed To Be“, The Atlantic Wire.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Business Technology professionals have a liberal bias!

Liberal Business Technology Professionals

This graph, from the July 2012 issue of Information Week magazine, reveals a very serious problem: apparently business professionals in the Information Technology sector have all been hypnotized and converted over to communism.

The magazine conducted a survey of 362 business technology professionals who believe that the U.S. is a former technology leader or is losing its leadership position. The survey was designed to find out why.

Obviously, any good, intelligent conservative answering this survey would immediately just yell “OBAMA!” and throw the survey onto the ground. Unfortunately, this answer was not one of the options provided.

The second-best answer, which did appear on the survey, would be “onerous U.S. tax and regulatory policies.” This is the obvious correct answer. Everyone knows that the big problem is America right now is too much regulation and too many taxes.

Yet somehow, mysteriously, only 20% of the business professionals answering this survey chose that response!

BUT THAT’S NOT ALL! IT GETS EVEN WORSE!

The reason most often cited for the United States losing its leadership position in the technology sector was “shortsighted decisions that are shipping tech jobs and innovation abroad”!

In other words, the stupid, liberal communist people who answered this survey are blaming the job creators!

How dare they?

This must be investigated further. We are potentially faced with a very serious problem: business technology professionals in the United States have been infected…. with the liberal bias!!!

 

graph source: scanned from Information Week Magazine, July 9, 2012

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013