LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351

Liberal Bias

Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

The GOP applauds the New England Blizzard for not giving in to “global warming”

Published on February 11, 2013 by in Graphs

 

Belief in climate change by party and temperature

In honor of blizzard “Nemo”, which buried New England under feet of snow this past weekend, we are ready to reveal a new GOP strategy to win over independent voters: MORE BLIZZARDS.

The above graph, recently published in the research journal “Climate and Society”, tells you everything you need to know. It shows how people who identify with different political parties (Democrat, Republican, and Independent) are affected by unusual changes in temperature. The basic findings of the study are as follows:

1) Republicans are always right: they have a very low probability of believing in climate change, no matter what the temperature is outside. Good for them.

2) Democrats are always wrong: they have a very high probability of believing in climate change, no matter what the temperature is outside.  Obviously that means they have been indoctrinated and are so ideologically skewed that nothing will change their minds.

3) Independents believe in climate change when it is warm outside, and do not believe in climate change when it’s cold outside.

 

Following the release of this study, the GOP has announced a new plank in the Republican Party Platform: Republicans are now officially “Pro-Winter Storm”!

For the sake of conservatism and the Republican party, we therefore would like to propose that from now on Presidential Elections only be held on the days of or immediately following really bad winter storms.

 

After all, just look at the graph above: the numbers make is clear that high temperatures just lead to liberal bias!!!

 

graph data source: Hamilton & Stampone in Weather, Climate and Society (2013)
graph found via: ScienceDaily.com

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Temperature anomalies have a liberal bias!

Published on November 28, 2012 by in Graphs

Liberal temperature anomalies

This left-wing propaganda chart seems to imply that this year is one of the hottest years since 1895. But that can’t be right, because some guy at Forbes magazine said the world is cooling!

According to this graph, January through July of this year was the warmest first seven months of any year on record for the United States. The national temperature of 56.4°F was 4.3°F above the long-term average. Most of the contiguous U.S. was record and near-record warm for the seven-month period, except the Pacific Northwest.

BUT THAT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT! THIS GRAPH IS A LIE!

How do I know?

Because Peter Ferrara told me.

Who is Peter Ferrara, you may ask? Is he some notable climate scientist? No, but even better: he’s the Director of Entitlement and Budget Policy for the Heartland Institute. And he wrote an article for Forbes magazine.

The title of this article is, “Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling.” So basically, you can stop reading right there. The earth is cooling, which totally disproves the above graph. Case closed.

But if you did bother to read further in the article, you would find that he attended a conference where lots of serious people said serious things, and one of the people presenting at this conference predicted that we are now in the middle of a 25-year cyclical cooling period. He makes dire predictions that it could get REALLY cold, in fact, over the next 10-15 years. You just wait.

You will also be impressed by the fact that Peter Ferrara spends a lot of time talking about how scientific and objective and not like partisan political hacks any of the people at these conferences are. You know he can recognize partisan political hacks when he sees them, because when you look over his history of contributions to Forbes Magazine you get things like:

Obama’s Real Unemployment Rate Is 14.7%, And A Recession’s On The Way
Obama Is The Biggest Spender In World History
There’s No Mystery To Slow Economic Growth: Progressives Are The Problem
Why the Supreme Court Will Strike Down All of Obamacare

Clearly this is a man who is not only unbiased, but is also correct about everything.

So I leave you with this question: which would you rather believe? The above chart created from government data? Or Peter Ferrara, the obviously neutral and unbiased non-scientist who attended a conference recently?

I know who I trust. How about you?

graph source: National Climactic Data Center

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Sneaky climate chart uses numbers to lie!

Published on November 23, 2012 by in Charts

Biased Climate Change Chart

This chart severely misrepresents the ambiguity of the Global Warming debate. By relying on liberally biased “numbers”, it fails to represent the basic principle of fairness: there are two sides to every story.

This chart is being spread on Facebook and through other liberal social media conduits. It divides the circle into two pieces: one piece represents people who believe in the fallacy of global warming (black) and the other piece represents the people who correctly reject the discredited theory of global warming (red). By nefariously making the surface area of each piece proportional to the number of studies supporting each position, it gives the overall impression that there is overwhelming support for the climate change lie.

In fact, by looking at this graph, one might even get the impression that people who deny climate change are just a sad, tiny little fringe cadre of whack-a-doodle extremists pathetically trying to get some attention by catering to ignorant people.

But that interpretation is obviously nonsense!!

The only conclusion, therefore, is that the graph must be wrong. This graph is simply unfair to climate change deniers.  And don’t liberals say they like fairness?

Unbiased climate change chartWe at LiberalBias.com have decided to provide for you the unskewed version of this same graph. Notice that this graph more correctly represents the fact that there are two sides to this story, and nobody can really know for sure what the right answer is. This graph shows the fair and balanced version of the debate.

Notice that we are not lying about any of the numbers, per se. We point out that 24 papers reject global warming. But we have adjusted the area of each section of the graph to correctly get across the correct feeling of the debate, namely: there are two sides to every story, and we’ll have to leave it there.

We will not allow our graphs to be dictated by numbers and statistics!

After all, if we did that, it would inevitably lead to liberal bias!!

 

graph data source: “The State of Climate Science: A Thorough Review of the Scientific Literature on Global Warming” by Dr. James Powell
graph found via: The “I fucking love science” Facebook Page

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Tracking Hurricane Sandy: Event Timeline

Published on October 30, 2012 by in Charts

Keep an eye on this LIVE FEED for constant updates on critical events related to the devastation of Hurricane Sandy. We offer the most complete picture, with no liberal bias!

Live Photo of Hurricane Sandy.

January 20, 2009:

- Barack Obama is inaugurated. This set the stage for multiple disasters, including the collapse of our economy, the total destruction of the constitution and freedom in America, and the unrepentant War on Christianity. God starts to get mad.

May 18, 2009:

- Barack Obama announces new mileage and efficiency standards as part of a secret plot to undermine industry and destroy the economy. God doesn’t like that.

January 7, 2010:

- The EPA proposes stricter limits on smog pollutants, trying to cynically use scare tactics to put their boots on the necks of small businesses through over-regulation. Now, God is really pissed.

June 24, 2011:

- New York legalizes same-sex marriages. Now God, in a blind rage, vows never to go back there, even if he wants to see a really good Broadway musical.

October 24, 2012:

- God finally gets sick of all of the liberals passing their stupid laws and acting all gay and stuff, and so decides to send up a hurricane as punishment.

October 25, 2012:

- Hurricane Sandy passed through the Bahamas, which is where Hurricane Katrina started, which everyone knows was divine retribution.

- Hurricane Sandy attacks Cuba, a sure sign that God hates communism and that Sandy is the fist of God punishing evildoers. He’s warming up for New York City.

October 26, 2012:

- New York City, that well-known hotbed of pornography, homosexuality, and other deviants,  declares a state of emergency instead of praying. Obviously, this makes God even more angry.

October 27, 2012: 

- New Jersey declares a state of emergency while God laughs.

October 28, 2012:

- Broadway theaters, The United Nations, and New Jersey casinos shut on Sunday night for 24 to 48 hours exactly as God planned. These are possibly three of the most sinful places on the entire East Coast.

October 29, 2012: 

- Power is out in thousands of New Jersey and Long Island homes and businesses.

- High winds and flooding are expected. God ponders flooding the entire planet, as punishment for America allowing Obama to be elected

- Gov. Romney calls Governors Bob McDonnell and Chris Christie about storm preparation, and prays.

October 30, 2012:

- In response to Romney’s prayers and phone calls, God weakens the storm so that it is downgraded from a Hurricane to a Tropical Storm.

 

….Thank you, Mitt Romney, for saving the ENTIRE WORLD!!!

 

And thank God that the media has kept politics out of their coverage of this terrible disaster.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Dumb liberals think human beings are fish

Published on October 22, 2012 by in Graphs

Global Warming Myth

Recently the ultra-left wing fringe communist website Media Matters criticized Fox News for their in-depth debunking of the “Global Warming” myth. The only thing sadder than liberals claiming “Global Warming” is liberals explaining away the PROOF that Global Warming is false.

Daily Mail reporter David Rose completely debunked the myth of Global Warming in every way, and this was covered extensively by the expert incisive reporters on “Fox & Friends”. Of course, this is when the Left Wing Hate Machine unleashes their demon attack dogs from hell to try to defame and drag through the mud anyone and anything that disagrees with their radical socialist agenda!!!111

There are too many things wrong with this Media Matters “hit piece” to even bother going through them all, so we will just focus on one point: the above graph.  According to the slimy Media Matters Article Of Lies,

Another problem with Rose’s analysis is that looking solely at atmospheric temperatures ignores a number of other indicators that global warming is happening… As the graph below shows, the global ocean has been warming considerably during the time that atmospheric temperatures appear to have stalled.

So in other words, supposed “global warming” is going on in the oceans but not in the air.

HOW STUPID ARE YOU, LIBERALS?

DON’T YOU KNOW HUMANS DON’T LIVE IN THE OCEAN??

People aren’t fish. Why do liberals not have any common sense?

Plus, if it’s just in the oceans you can’t really call it “global” warming, can you? It’s just “water warming.” What possible difference could that make?

 

graph found via: MediaMatters.org

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Death Valley has a liberal bias!

Published on September 22, 2012 by in Featured

Happy Christian Valley.

Death Valley has recently been declared the hottest place on earth.

There is something fishy going on here, and it smells a lot like liberal bias.

Consider these questions: Who might benefit from people associating something negative like “Death” with high temperatures? What agenda might be served by ramming down the public’s throats the idea the things being “hot” means something negative or hurtful?  Could this possibly be part of a sinister plot by environmentalists and liberal scientists to further promote the agenda of the fake and completely made-up “global warming” ruse?

We’re just asking the question.

Obviously, liberals would love it if everyone associated high temperatures with death and destruction. It is part of their plan to subjugate humanity through fear and weather.

SIGN OUR ONLINE PETITION

In order to combat this sinister form of liberal bias, please check the box below to sign our online petition to immediately re-name “Death Valley” to “Happy Christian Valley”.  That way, on the off chance that the planet is actually getting warmer, people will know that it’s God’s will and will be happy about it.

  • YES! I agree that “Death Valley” should be renamed “Happy Christian Valley” in order to promote conservative values and combat the evil liberal bias of climate science.

Thank you for your support.

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013