Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

There are two sides to every story, and one of them is socialist.

Conservative Graph

When science says that Fox News is biased, there is only one obvious and correct response: “Nuh uh… you are!”

Liberals like to make fun of conservatives for being “anti-science” and unfortunately a lot of conservatives fall for this trick, and get all squeamish and apologize or deny that they are anti-science. The fact is, if you are a real conservative, you should stand up and be proudly anti-science.

Science explicitly and unashamedly does not take values into consideration when evaluating theories. Science is tyrannical about rejecting theories that do not fit data, no matter how much those theories might make intuitive sense or be based on moral wisdom. Science is elitist and scoffs at anything that it doesn’t consider “real data”. Why can’t Christian Values also be considered data, huh? Stupid tyrannical scientists.

There is no reason to think that being anti-Science is a bad thing. The only reason people in our society have been brainwashed into accepting that science is good is because of the moral decay and insidious propaganda of the left wing.

According to science, when there are two sides to a story, one of them is right and the other is wrong.

According to conservatives, when there are two sides to a story, one of them is Right and the other is socialist!

And that is why science itself has a permanent and unavoidable liberal bias!!!

 

graph found via: scientificamerican.com (altered by LiberalBias.com to remove all the bias)

 
7 Comments  comments 

7 Responses

  1. You'reconfused

    Actually that’s called Republicans. True conservatives lie somewhere in between but they get ignored or pushed to the side since they are not extreme enough.

    Both Fox news and CNN are extreme left and right wings but in the bigger picture they sleep on the same bed.

    Here is a good example of what I mean.

    Say you are watching a whale from two different camera angles in a gigantic aquatic tank but you are not told what you are seeing or are told there is movement going on but not to what extent.

    The two camera views show both the head and tail. Let’s name the Whale Monstro Junior from Pinnochio just for kicks.

    I hope you are still with me and you’re brain didn’t explode from this example.

    At first glance it seems they (both head and tail) are separate of each other until you find out that when the head moves the tail seems to follow behind then you realize they are somehow connected and not two different mammals.

    Same thing with politics only they have fancy names to their title and about selling themselves it’s become like a county fair.

    And you’re right about Science not allowing wisdom because feelings are non existent in the realm of science and you cannot have moral values like thou shalt not steal or kill which the later is a mistranslation from Hebrew which means thou shalt not murder.

  2. You'reconfused

    Oops. I messed up my sentences at the end.

    I meant to end it with that in science being an individual cannot exist as that could counteract whatever data they are trying to find so you have to be like The Borg with group think to help the data be more accurate. Gotta feed the machine! It’s you’re duty.

    Now if the group don’t like it you are an outcast and to be shamed no matter how real you’re personal experiences are due to being at the right place at the right time.

    Now as for the bible the reason why it’s so confusing is it was written over long periods of time which a lot of mistranslation about culture and language got ignored by the big corporation type churches that will shun you if you dare correct them.

    Literally the bible went thru translation after translation after translation after translation before making it to English which English has all these rules and exceptions in our language invented in Oxford University in England.

    Periods the (.) mark was done for court documents because the sentences would run off ontoeachotherlikethiswithoutabreak. Does that hurt you’re eyes?

    Imagine being a judge in the 1400s and reading someone’s case to decide a fair verdict and seingsentenceslooklikethis.

    How about we make a rule for end marks at a sentence to decide where one idea ends and another starts NO?

    Or how about commas (,) to continue an idea where one thought ends but the next thought adds more.

  3. You'reconfused

    Now as for the bible the reason why it’s so confusing is it was written over long periods of time which a lot of mistranslation about culture and language got ignored by the big corporation type churches that will shun you if you dare correct them.

    Literally the bible went thru translation after translation after translation after translation before making it to English which English has all these rules and exceptions in our language invented in Oxford University in England.

    Periods the (.) mark was done for court documents because the sentences would run off ontoeachotherlikethiswithoutabreak. Does that hurt you’re eyes?

    Imagine being a judge in the 1400s and reading someone’s case to decide a fair verdict and seingsentenceslooklikethis.

    How about we make a rule for end marks at a sentence to decide where one idea ends and another starts NO?

    Or how about commas (,) to continue an idea where one thought ends but the next thought adds more.

  4. You'reconfused

    Imagine life without periods or commas.

  5. […] For more “unskewed graphs”, check out these items over at LiberalBias.com: UNSKEWED GRAPH: Scientists split on climate change Federal Spending Graph: UNSKEWED!!!! There are two sides to every story, and one of them is socialist […]

  6. […] like he takes the whole “fair and balanced” thing seriously. We all know there are two sides to every story: what the Democrat party says and the truth. But I […]

  7. […] related articles: Federal Spending Graph: UNSKEWED!, There are two sides to every story, and one of them is socialist. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2015


Google+