LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351
Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Confederate History and Liberal Bias

In honor of Confederate History Month, today we present an educational article about terrible liberal bias that appears in the way modern politicians and educators talk about the Confederacy and Civil War.

Ray McBerry is a perfect example of how creeping liberalism has created a deliberate distortion of the true nature and philosophy of the Confederacy.

Ray McBerry, a vocal advocate of Confederate History Month, said in an interview with The Daily Beast that the Civil War was not really about slavery:

“It was about a federal government that was out of control and imposing its will on the states—a federal government that was acting beyond the scope of the Constitution. Ironically, some of the very issues we are debating today.”

This is something that we hear all the time: the Civil War was about States’ Rights. The Confederacy loved the Constitution and it was the north that was violating it.

THIS IS A LIBERAL DECEPTION AND A LIE!

It’s pretty clear what is going on here: conservatives have been bullied into being afraid of being called “racist” by liberals. Conservatives are therefore trying to distort and lie and whitewash the truth about the Confederacy in order to make it more “acceptable” to liberals.

What is the truth about the Confederacy?

We will let the words of the Vice President of the Confederacy, Alexander H. Stephens, in his 1861 Cornerstone Speech, speak for themselves:

Confederate History Month

That is the true philosophy of the Confederacy.

Do not let these modern apologists try to lie to you and say anything different, just because the liberals have scared them with the “R” word (“racist”).

Why you scared of your conservative Southern heritage, Ray?

Stand up and own it.

Running from the real meaning of the Confederacy, after all, could be seen as just another form of liberal bias!!!

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

This car has a liberal bias!

This car is a liberal.

This car represents a success of government financial assistance, which is ridiculous because all conservatives know that government can never help anything. Therefore, this car doesn’t exist. Or something.

Let’s consider some background. During the 2012 Presidential Debates, Mitt Romney said this to President Obama about government subsidies for green energy: “You put $90 billion — like 50 years’ worth of breaks — into solar and wind, to Solyndra and Fisker and Tesla and Ener1. I mean, I had a friend who said, you don’t just pick the winners and losers; you pick the losers.”

It was very easy for Romney to identify Tesla as a “loser” in October 2012. At that time, it was obvious that Tesla’s entire game-plan of building “electric cars” was ridiculous and a waste of time. Moreover, green energy is a waste of time. To give money to companies that are already successful, like Shell Oil, makes sense; but to give money to companies that might fail, like Tesla, is throwing money away on losers. And socialism. It never works. Period.

But then, some weird stuff happened.

In November of 2012, Tesla’s Model S won Motor Trend’s Car of the Year.

In March of 2013, Tesla announced that they were making enough money to pay back their Department of Energy loan 5 years earlier than expected.

And in the April of 2013, Tesla announces that it expects its first profitable quarter.

It’s almost as if…. (now brace yourself)…. the financial assistance from the government actually helped an American industry to develop to the point where it could succeed on its own!

 

HEY TESLA!

HOW DARE YOU CONTRADICT MITT ROMNEY, AND GOOD CONSERVATIVE COMMON SENSE?

 

Government financial assistance NEVER helps anything! Green energy NEVER succeeds!  What is going on here?

 

It’s pretty clear that this must all be the result of some kind of deep conspiracy, and liberal bias.  There is only one unavoidable conclusion:

The Tesla Model-S…. is a liberal!

We have added the appropriate speech bubble to the above photo to illustrate this fact.

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Manifesto of a radical first amendment advocate

I’m a radical first amendment advocate. I will fight to the death to say whatever the **** I ****ing want to say.  Why? Because it’s in the ****ing constitution, that’s why.

I’ve heard all of the stupid ****ing arguments from ****-****ing ****ers who want to take away my first amendment rights. But none of their **** ****-**** **** makes any ****-damn sense.

First, and most importantly, it’s in the ****ing constitution, you ****-****ing ****s. Does the constitution say “freedom of speech except for some words“? NO. Does the constitution say “freedom of speech except in some places“? NO. Therefore, any attempt to regulate my speech AT ALL is clearly a violation of my constitutional rights.

Really, that should be the end of the entire ****-**** ****ing argument. The **** constitution is the basis of our entire **** country. Who do these **** ****s think they are?

Now, some **** ****-****s are going to say, “Hey, you don’t really NEED to use those words, do you? Why would anyone NEED to use those words?”

IT’S NOT ABOUT NEED, YOU **** **** ****-**** ****!

When something is a RIGHT that is guaranteed in the constitution, it is not required to demonstrate a ****ing “need”! You don’t ****ing need your ****ing gay-**** marriage, but you still think that’s a right, don’t you? Well, I have a ****ing right to say whatever the **** I want to, because it’s in the ****-****ing constitution, so there’s nothing you can do about it! So **** the **** off!

Other people say, “But words can hurt!” No they ****ing can’t you stupid ****-****er!

Words don’t hurt people, it’s only people who ****ing use words the wrong ****ing way who hurt people.

Don’t blame the ****ing words, ****ers!

Plus, the answer isn’t to try to ****ing force people to not use certain ****ing words. The answer is to use MORE OF THOSE WORDS! Isn’t that obvious?? After all, if every ****ing **** in the whole ****ing **** used ****-****ing **** words all the ****ing time, then everyone would be safer.

Finally, some really ****-****ed ****-****s have argued that regulating just a few words, those words that are “especially harmful”, isn’t really that ****ing bad, and that the benefits outweigh the costs.

WHAT A LOAD OF ****ing ****-****ed ****!

It’s a slippery ****ing slope, guys. Where will it end?

If the ****ing government bans words like “****” and “****“, then what’s to stop them from banning the word “sheep” or “toaster” next?

If we allow them to ban yelling “fire” in a crowded building, what’s to stop them from banning saying the word “Christian” in public parks?

WHERE WILL IT ****ING END???

It ends here!

That’s what I ****ing say. I will not ****ing allow those ****s to ****ing regulate my First ****ing Amendment ****ing rights.

They can pry my ****ing **** **** from my dead cold ****ing ****.

That is why I am a radical first amendment advocate.

And you should be, too.

—Anonymous

P.S. This ****ing website “LiberalBias.com” better not ****ing censor my ****, or I’ll **** their **** up. Seriously. ****.

 


 

Share this manifesto as an image using the snapshot below:

First Amendment Advocate Manifesto

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

The 10 Commandments of Liberal Bias

A slideshow illustrating 10 easy-to-remember laws that will help you to identify liberal bias and fight against it.

debug=
 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

State-level gun death statistics have a liberal bias!

Published on April 1, 2013 by in Graphs

Gun Death StatisticsEveryone knows that shootings are caused by drug-crazed, video-game-playing liberals who are from poor urban neighborhoods or neighborhoods that have been wussified by liberal gun control policies. Yet this graph seems to suggest otherwise.

Some big nerd over at The Atlantic took well-known gun death rate statistics for each state, and looked at a broad range of other statistics for each state to see whether there was any statistical correlation.

Something obviously must be wrong with these numbers, because they seem to go exactly against what every common-sense conservative intuition would lead you to believe.

This table shows some of the highlights:

conservative ideology liberal statistics
shootings are all done by people who are crazy or on drugs there is no statistical relationship between either mental illness, neurosis, or drug use in a particular state, and the rate of gun deaths in that state
having guns in schools makes everyone safer firearm-related deaths are positively correlated with the rates of high school students that carry weapons on school property (correlation +0.54).
immigrants are dangerous and a big source of the problem states with more immigrants have lower levels of gun-related deaths (correlation -0.34).
assault rifle bans and safety regulation have absolutely no effect at all on gun violence because criminals will do whatever they want to. there are substantial negative correlations between firearm deaths and states that ban assault weapons (-0.45), require trigger locks (-0.42), and mandate safe storage requirements for guns (-0.48).
liberal states are more dangerous because those liberals don’t know how to handle themselves and they’re all criminals anyway. Firearm-related deaths were positively associated with states that voted for McCain in 2004 (+0.66) and negatively associated with states that voted for Obama (-0.66)

 

Of course, as if all of this weren’t bad enough, the final result just exposes the liberal bias in these statistics for what they are: Firearm deaths were far less likely to occur in states with more creative class jobs (-0.52).

“Creative class jobs”?  Uh huh… we all know what that means….

 

…LIBERALS!

 

graph data source: statehealthfacts.org
graph found via: theatlantic.com

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

REAL Christians know the word “Easter” has liberal bias!

Fox News is trying to bully schools into using the word “Easter” more. This is part of a vast left-wing conspiracy to push paganism. Real Christians know the word “Easter” has a liberal bias.

If you are a real conservative—which means you are a Christian, because in America all real conservatives are Christians—then you know that the word “Easter” is a pagan plague that has infected the righteous along with bunnies and eggs and other things that children love. Children should not love religious holidays, they should just worship and behave. The idea that holidays should be fun is a liberal corruption.

The word “Easter” derives from the name of the German pagan goddess Ēostre, who represented spring time.  So in other words, when you say “happy Easter” to someone you are not being a Christina.  You are not only celebrating a very non-Christian pagan god, which is bad enough, but a girl God, at that.

This is clearly not what the Founding Fathers would have wanted. That is why the Founding Fathers wrote specifically in the constitution that female pagan gods were not allowed to vote, and that is also why good Christians make their children hunt for Resurrection Eggs instead of Easter Eggs.

Resurrection Eggs

So given all of these very obvious and self-evident facts, why is is that Fox News has been on a rampage trying to guilt schools into using the word “Easter”?

There is mounting evidence that Fox News is actually a hyper-liberal socialist organization that is trying to undermine Christian values.  For example, we have caught them making blatantly anti-Christian claims that some galaxies and certain rocks might be more than 6000 years old, which is obviously in contradiction with the bible and based on liberal “theory” and pseudo-science.

This latest development just adds more proof: Fox News is promoting paganism by trying to force schools to worship the pagan goddess Ēostre!

Some people have speculated that this is part of an ongoing plan to erode Christianity in the United States so that it can be replaced by Islam. After all, Fox News is partially owned by Saudi Arabia.

 

So anyway, as you celebrate the day today, please remember this: The word “Easter” does not appear in the Bible.  And if it doesn’t appear in the Bible, then it must be the Devil’s work.  Just like cell phones.

Anybody who tells you anything differently is obviously simply trying to spread liberal bias!!!

 

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013