LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351

Liberal Bias

Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Special Sections:

Featured Bias
Featured Bias
Guest Articles
Guest Articles
Illuminated Truth
Illuminated Truth
Liberal Bias Video
Liberal Bias Video

Welfare statistics have liberal bias!

Published on April 16, 2012 by in Graphs

Families Receiving Welfare

New Gingrich, the cuddly prophet of conservatism, has called Obama the “food stamp president” and the “welfare president.” Bill O’Reilly, who is never wrong, has said that under Obama we have become a “welfare nation.”  Dick Morris, on Fox News, said, “Obama Has Basically Put Everybody In The Country On Welfare.”

So how is it possible that this above graph shows the number of families receiving welfare assistance is dramatically lower than it was at any time in the 1990′s? Indeed, according to this graph, there are almost 2 million fewer families receiving welfare assistance now than there were in 1996.  According to this graph, the number of families receiving welfare looks like it is going down even though the number of families with children in poverty has been going up!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, WELFARE FAMILIES? WHY ARE YOU CONTRADICTING FOX NEWS?

There is clearly a very sinister plot going on here. Since welfare recipients are notoriously liberal, they must be refusing to accept the free handouts that Obama is trying to give them just to make Fox News look bad.

But we know better! This statistic clearly is just the product of a massive conspiracy and  liberal bias!!!!

graph source:  Graph: Washington Post, Data: CBPP
found via: Washington Post

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
17 Comments  comments 

Manufacturing jobs have liberal bias!

Published on April 12, 2012 by in Graphs

Liberal Manufacturing Employment

Republican policies are pro-business and pro-jobs. Everyone knows this. As a result, any sensible statistic should show that businesses and employment boom under Republican presidents and stagnate or deteriorate under Democratic presidents.

Yet somehow, the above graph seems to show that manufacturing jobs plummeted during George Bush’s presidency. Remarkably, the steep decline, with manufacturing jobs disappearing at record rates, began almost the moment George Bush’s policies began to take effect!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, STUPID MANUFACTURING JOBS? WHY ARE YOU DECLINING DURING A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENCY?

I will tell you why: Manufacturing jobs are engaged in a secret liberal plot to make conservatives look bad.  By maliciously declining while George Bush is in power, manufacturing jobs create the illusion that Republicans are bad at creating jobs.

But do not be fooled! It is clear that these manufacturing jobs are completely motivated by liberal bias!!!!!

graph source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
found via: USW.org

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
5 Comments  comments 

The dark art of graph reading

Published on April 9, 2012 by in Graphs

Unemployment and Tax Rates

Reading and understanding the meaning behind graphs and charts is very complex, which is why it should never be left to amateurs. For example, the above graph has been circulated around the web by liberals who claim that it shows that lowering taxes on the rich does not actually reduce unemployment.

Indeed, when viewed by inexperienced and irrational people, like liberals for example, it might appear that although the tax rate on the rich has been readily decreasing (red line), the unemployment rate has gone up and down in the same basic range with no obviously apparent pattern (blue line). Thus they conclude that decreasing taxes on the rich does not lead to a decrease of unemployment.

BUT DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THIS LIBERAL WAY OF LOOKING AT THE GRAPH!

Reading graphs is actually a very exact and mysterious science, like medicine or numerology, and should only be practiced by people with a keen eye and intellect who know what to look for and what results they want to see.

A correct interpretation of this graph is as follows:

Unemployment and Taxes - Clarification

As you can see, each time that taxes on the rich were decreased there was a corresponding decrease in unemployment.  Now, it didn’t always happen right away… sometimes things take time to have their effect.  Plus, there are other ups and downs in unemployment that obviously were also influenced by other factors: world markets, regulation laws, fear of a black president, and so on.  But the fact remains that once you remove the “noise” in the unemployment rate, and account for the time delays, there exists a decrease in unemployment for every decrease in taxes on the rich.

Those are hard, numerical facts.

 

graph source: U.S. Department of Labor
found via: MetaGalacticLlamas.com

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

The Supreme Court has a liberal Bias!

Published on April 5, 2012 by in Graphs

Biased Supreme Court Graph

One of the most sinister and insidious pieces of propaganda in today’s politics is the myth that today’s Supreme Court is somehow a “conservative” court. There are many liberals who complain that the court is “too conservative,” but there are even conservatives who celebrate that the court is “conservative”: both are wrong.

Part of the problem is that people are mislead by biased and corrupted graphs like the one above. In the graph above you see measurements that seem to show that the Supreme Court is to the conservative side of the supposed “neutral” line down the middle.  At the bottom of the graph, there are even little numbers to make you believe that they show how conservative the individual justices are: Oh look! The middle justice has between +1 and +2 conservativeness, and the most conservative justice is at +4 conservativeness!  Isn’t that wonderful?

NO THAT IS NOT WONDERFUL! IT’S STILL TOO LIBERAL

This graph misrepresents a basic truth about our court system, and that is that the courts are supposed to be conservative!  The supposed “neutral” line on the above graph is a total fiction created by liberals to make us believe that we are supposed to “compromise” on our basic values.

But the fact is, the Supreme Court was always intended to be a conservative body. Mark Levin, who sounds really smart and is therefore should be believed, has instructed us on several occasions that the role of the court is to be as conservative as possible in their interpretation of the constitution: anything else is “judicial activism.”

Therefore, in order to remove this liberal bias from the graph, it must be re-labelled  in the following manner:

Supreme Court Graph - Unbiased

In this graph we clearly see, that although there is some progress in the correct direction, the Supreme Court is still infested with a liberal bias: note that even the most conservative justice still scores between a +3 and a +4 on the “Judicial Activism” scale.

The Supreme Court will only fulfill its true and proper role under the constitution when all of the lines are at the extreme right of the graph!!  That will mean that they are free from their evil liberal activist tendencies.

Any justice that is doing anything other than the most extreme conservative thing possible, is guilty of nothing less than liberal bias!!!!

graph source: Nate Silver of the NY Times
found via: BeerBarrelPolitics Blog

 
Tags:
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Freedom in America! A bias-free graph.

Published on April 2, 2012 by in Graphs

American Freedom

You will be pleased to know that the above graph does not contain any liberal bias. It is a completely accurate numerical analysis that shows the effect of the Tea Party in Congress and specifically the glorious effect of conservative values in the House of Representatives. Thanks to our freedom-fighting Tea Party representatives, we have been able to dramatically increase the amount of freedom in this country.

Of course, this is not the original graph.  The original graph was horribly distorted by a liberally biased caption that was misleading, suggestive, inappropriate, and all kinds of other words that mean bad stuff.

The original graph, filled with bias, is here:

Biased Graph

Fortunately for you, however, we have been able to alter the graph in such a way as to make it free from bias, so that it accurately highlights the glory and superiority of the United States and the Tea Party Conservative wave. As a result, you do not have the view the version of the graph that has been infected by liberal bias!!!!

graph source: Guttmacher Institute
found via: SomeDisagree.com

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

Government spending has a liberal bias!

Published on March 30, 2012 by in Graphs

Liberal Government Spending

Everybody knows that liberals are constantly increasing the size of government, spending money that they don’t have, racking up insane levels of debt, and generally being irresponsible.  Conservatives, on the other hand, always spend less and are fiscally responsible.

So how is it possible that the above graph seems to give the impression that Reagan, Bush, and Bush all increased government spending more in their first terms in office than either Clinton or Obama?  In fact, somehow the line for Obama decreases below zero, suggesting that he has actually decreased government spending, which is obviously impossible because everyone knows that the entire deficit has been caused by him and his anti-American speeches.

WHAT IS GOING ON WITH YOU, WEIRD SPENDING STATISTICS?

There can be only one answer.  Once again, this is quite simply a case where the numbers themselves are lying about the truth. The truth is that conservatives spend less and liberals spend more. Any so-called “numbers” that contradict this have obviously been infected by LIBERAL BIAS!!!!

source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
via: PoliticalRuminations.com

 

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013