LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351
Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

graph reveals liberal anti-American agenda

Published on May 7, 2012 by in Graphs

Subliminal Messages

Some of you have seen the above graph that has been circulated by liberals to try to confuse us into thinking that conservatives are not fiscally responsible.

All of their arguments have already been debunked, so I will not waste time doing it again here. Instead, I would like to point out the subliminal propaganda that demonstrates–no, actually proves beyond a shadow of a doubt–that liberals hate America.

Our crack team of specialists, investigative journalists, and political analysis have examined the icons used in the above graph in minute detail, and they have discovered a very interesting pattern: the liberal presidents are showing less of the American Flag in their icons than the conservative presidents!

Just look at these two icons in detail as examples:

Bush Flag IconObama Flag Icon

WHY are the liberal presidents afraid to be associated with the American flag? Are they ashamed to be seen with it? Is it because the want to send a secret message to their foreign friends about whose side they are really on?

Liberals might want to distract you from this issue, by telling you to focus on the “real” substance of the above graph or the “data” that it presents about the national debt.

But every time a liberal shows you this graph, make sure you ask them this: WHAT ABOUT THE FLAGS?

If they don’t want to discuss it, if they pretend to be confused or baffled by the question, there is only one explanation: Liberal bias!!

graph source: Office of the Democratic Leader
data source:  The Treasury Department
graph found viaMoveOn.org

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
9 Comments  comments 

Obesity statistics have a liberal bias!

Published on May 3, 2012 by in Charts

Obesity Propaganda

The above map shows the so-called “obesity” level in different states. Some people have noted that this so-called “obesity” phenomenon appears more  in conservative states than in states with liberal bias. This has been used in liberal propaganda to suggest that something is wrong with conservatives.

This interpretation of the statistics, however, is very biased. For one thing, it is important to remember that correlation is not the same thing as causation. Liberals want you to interpret this to mean that being a conservative causes people to have health problems, which is obviously ridiculous and a sign that liberals have no common sense.

Secondly, who’s to say that so-called “obesity’ is a problem? Maybe obese people are just jolly, like Santa Claus. After all, look at people like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levine, and Chris Christie. They are so hugely, disgustingly massively obese that whales look at them and think, “Bro, you need to go on a diet.”  They are so enormous that they could feed a family of four using just the food splashes over the sides of their troughs. They are so sordidly gargantuan that, every time they come up in conversation, people break out into spontaneous comedy skits about how fat they are.

And yet, they are the leaders of the conservative movement.

The only logical conclusion is, naturally, that obesity just isn’t that big of a deal.

So instead of viewing the above map as an indicator that something is wrong with conservatives, you should consider the possible alternative explanations.

1) Conservatives are generally happier, because they are in tune with truth and justice and the way that the universe is supposed to work. People who are happy are able to enjoy life, which includes eating tasty food if they want to, which leads them to have a more substantial weight. The supposed phenomenon of “obesity” is just a physical manifestation of happiness.

2) Conservatives are not oppressed by the evil propaganda of environmentalist, vegetarians, vegans, evolutionists, pastafarians, and other radical liberal interest groups that seek to control human behavior because they hate freedom. Because conservatives have more choice, they simply enjoy a wider variety of foods, which leads them to not being as emaciated as do-gooder liberals. Their greater weight is therefore simply a physical manifestation of freedom.

3) Conservatives understand that when the Rapture comes, they will be taken bodily up into heaven, which means the the more body they have, the of heaven they can claim as their own.

These are the true and honest interpretations of this map. Anything else is just liberal bias!!!!

map data source: CalorieLab
map found via: The Centrist Word

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
8 Comments  comments 

Corn: tasty treat, or communist plot?

Liberal Corn

We should have seen this coming for a long, long time.  The signs were all there.

After all, is it just a coincidence that candy corn is the most commonly distributed candy during Halloween, the heathen socialist holiday? Is it pure chance that the cornucopia was a mythical object that gave out free food to those who don’t deserve it?  Can it really be simply a matter of chance that Cornell is the most elitist, intellectually snobby ivy-league liberal University in upstate New York?

Of course it is, but no matter.

The point is that corn has finally revealed itself to be a part of a wide-spread liberal plot to oppress industry and radically increase government power in America.

How will it do this, you ask?

As you may have guessed, the answer is simple: Global Warming.

Recently, a large number of articles have been coming out describing the fact that if the earth’s temperature rises too much, the price of corn could drastically increase.  Because corn has become such a basic ingredient in all of our foods and drinks, a drastic increase in corn prices could essentially raise the price of all food.

WHAT ARE WRONG WITH YOU, STUPID CORN? WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO MESS UP OUR LIVES???

I will explain why. Corn is part of a secret liberal conspiracy to punish companies that are exercising their God-given right to pollute as much as they want to in order to make a profit. There is no other answer for it: corn stalks are secret liberals!!!!

I have added the appropriate thought bubble in the above picture, to illustrate this fact.

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Presidential vacations demonstrate liberal failure!

Vacations Show Republican Success

It has come to our attention that some people interpret the above graph incorrectly.

Some people might look at the above graph and think that liberal presidents work harder than conservative presidents. Some people might look at the above graph and think that conservative presidents slack off, or are not as focused on solving America’s problem.

BUT THAT INTERPRETATION IS WRONG AND FILLED WITH LIBERAL NONSENSE!

What is the correct interpretation of the above graph?

The correct interpretation is that conservative presidents do such a fantastic and efficient job of running the country, that they can actually afford to take more vacation time.  Liberals, on the other hand, are incompetent fools who don’t deserve any time off.

Do not doubt me on this. If you know how to read between the lines, as I do, you can see that this is the obvious conclusion that this graph leads you to.

Anything else is just liberal bias!!!!!!!

 

data source: CBS News
graph by: Greg Stevens

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

Science’s increasing liberal bias!

History of Scientific Bias

Liberals like to talk about how conservatives have become more and more hostile toward science over time.  The fact is: it is science that has become more and more hostile toward conservatives over time!

The above graph demonstrates conclusively that ever since the birth of Jesus, science has had an increasing liberal bias!  Indeed, if you exclude the anomalous freak occurrence of the radical liberal Aristotle in 384 B.C., science has basically had an increasing liberal bias throughout all of history!

An explanation and analysis of the graph is provided below. The “liberal bias score” was determined using an 11-point balanced Likert scale evaluation of each scientific theory by a convenient sample of survey participants (N=1). But none of that is important because let’s face it, nobody ever pays attention to the methodology of scientific studies: they just look at the pretty graphs.

625 B.C Thales of Miletus says that the earth floats on water.Analysis: This statement is consistent with the Bible, which states that originally there were the “waters of the deep” and that the earth, i.e. land, was created in that water. Thus, we give this theory an overall rating of “conservative.” Score:

-3

(conservative)

460 B.C Democritus claims that all matter is made up of atoms.Analysis: Atoms are never mentioned in the Bible, so this claim is slightly suspect. Plus, the person’s name is “Democritus” which automatically suggests liberal bias. However, the theory itself is not especially liberal or conservative. Thus we give this theory an overall rating of only “slightly liberal”. Score:

1

(slightly liberal)

384 B.C. Aristotle claims that all events have a natural cause, and although there must have been an original “un-moved mover” (God) it (sic) no longer participates or willfully influences the world.Analysis: This is clearly heretical and filled with godless liberal nonsense. It denies the possibility of a personal God granting miracles or punishing gays or doing any of the other things that God obviously does. Moreover, Aristotle wrote political essays about how the government should help citizens to have happy lives, which means he was also a socialist who was against personal responsibility. Obviously a radical liberal lunatic. Score:

5

(extremely liberal)

287 B.C. Archimedes discovers mathematical laws that govern the volumes of shapes and the properties of simple tools like levers.Analysis: There is nothing especially conservative or liberal about these mathematical relationships. On the one hand, it is important to observe and understand the laws that God has commanded the universe to work by. On the other hand, it might have been better if Archimedes had made the point that God can over-ride these rules at any time. As a result, we give these discoveries an overall rating of neutral. Score:

0

(neutral)

161 A.D. Galen analyzes animal bodies in order to develop theories about human anatomy.Analysis: Galen was a strong proponent of using observation in order to develop medical theories, but also understood the importance of using logic, intuition, instinct, and beliefs in the development of scientific theories. Plus, he refused to violate the dignity of corpses and instead experimented on animal corpses. He is therefore one of the earliest examples of an anti-Animal Rights activist, and so we give him an overall rating of conservative. Score:

-3

(conservative)

354 A.D. Saint Augustine explains that although beings have constantly changed since creation, one species cannot change into another.Analysis: This brilliant insight cannot be stressed enough, even in current scientific debate. Evolutionists like to claim that because things change, one species automatically must change into another. Augustine argued against that over a thousand years before Darwin was even born! He therefore deserves credit for being extremely conservative. Score:

-5

(extremely conservative)

525 A.D. Dionysius Exiguus discovers that all years should be counted starting with the year of Jesus’s birth and should be identified as “the year of our Lord” (Anno Domini, or A.D.).Analysis: Obviously this is one of the great scientific discoveries of all of history, and is completely consistent with conservative values. Liberals who are trying to destroy our culture want to replace this label with “C.E.” Score:

-5

(extremely conservative)

1473 A.D. Copernicus claims that the sun, not the earth, is the center of the universe.Analysis: This is an attempt to minimize the importance of man, God’s highest creation, and reduce us to “just some part” of a larger universe. Although not totally liberal on its own, this theory is setting the stage to erode conservative values. Therefore, this theory gets a score of “slightly liberal”. Score:

1

(slightly liberal)

1564 A.D. Galileo claims that scientific theories must be validated by experiments.Analysis: This was clearly the beginning of the end, when it comes to science. Prior to this, scientists turned to scripture, morality, and intuition to help them to decide what theories were correct. Galileo thought that experiments mattered more than scripture or faith. Obviously a liberal theory. Score:

3

(liberal)

1642 A.D. Newton describes three laws of motion.Analysis: These laws are neither liberal nor conservative. Although they are not explicitly mentioned in the Bible, the Bible does talk about God’s Laws and it’s reasonable to suppose that these laws of motion might be exactly what God intended. The overall score of these laws is therefore neutral. Score:

0

(neutral)

1791 A.D. Faraday introduces the notion of magnetic “force fields”.Analysis: The very idea that there are unseen forces that are not made up of matter, but are not the direct will of God, is downright pagan sorcery and magic. Introducing the idea of a “field” into physics is basically the same as saying “Devil powers” but using a less intimidating name. Obviously a liberal theory. Score:

3

(liberal)

1809 A.D. Darwin comes up with the idea of evolution.Analysis: This one really requires no discussion, right? Score:

5

(extremely liberal)

1916 A.D. Einstein’s theory of relativity.Analysis: There are a number of problems with relativity, not the least of which being that it involves “relativism” which states that things depend on your point of view. This is a dangerous idea that can lead to moral decay. Score:

3

(liberal)

1925 A.D. Heisenberg claims that positions and velocities are uncertain and are not even concretely defined unless they are observed by people.Analysis: The whole idea that the state of the universe depends on what people observe? What about what God observes? God knows the position AND velocity of every single atom! To deny the omniscience of God is the utmost of liberal atheist arrogance! Score:

4

(very liberal)

1936 A.D. Alan Turing comes up with the conceptual basis for the programmable computer.Analysis: Turing was a homosexual. Obviously anything he creates is very liberal. Score:

5

(extremely liberal)

1945 A.D. Schroedinger publishes “What is life?” putting forth theories about chemistry, structure and replication.Analysis: This discussion of life does not allow any role for the soul and attempts to completely reduce all life to just chemicals like the stuff you find in a bucket at a factory. ARE YOU JUST CHEMICALS? Of course not. Liberal nonsense. Score:

4

(very liberal)

1965 A.D. Discoveries by Penzias and Wilson lead to the broad acceptance of the “Big Bang” theory.Analysis: The “Big Bang Theory” is not described in tbe bible, and is very clearly an attempt to remove God from any discussion of the origins of the universe. But can the “big bang” explain life? No. And where did the “big bang” come from? Obviously a flawed atheist theory meant to undermine conservative values. Score:

4

(very liberal)

1997 A.D. Wilmut and Campbell clone a sheep.Analysis: Once again arrogant scientist are trying to infringe upon the domain of life and creation, which by all rights should only be the proper activity of God. This is immoral and contrary to good conservative values. Score:

5

(extremely liberal)

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Titanic movie advocates liberal eco-terrorism!

Liberal Titanic Eco-Terrorist

With the new release of the Titanic movie coming up, there has been a lot of talk about the political subtext and implications of the movie.

Naturally, many people have noticed the very obvious liberal bias in the plot of the movie: it portrays job creators as evil and selfish and denying lifeboats to the lazy free-loading poor people. All of this has, of course, been debunked, and is purely a fabrication of liberal Hollywood.

If that were all there was to it, there would be very little to talk about here.

BUT THERE IS A DEEPER, MORE SINISTER LIBERAL PLOT!!!

It is not as obvious, but if you know how to read between the lines, as I do, you can see that in fact this movie is a tribute to the eco-terrorist pagan liberal Goddess of Gaia!!!

Do not doubt me on this.

Here are the facts:

  1. Liberals do not worship God, but liberal environmentalists worship the planet earth (which they refer to using the name of the pagan female goddess “Gaia”).
  2. In the movie Titanic, we see nature taking revenge on the evil industrialist humans that have dared to build a ship that runs on fossil fuels
  3. An iceberg is the perfect metaphor for the earth getting revenge on humans, because liberals claim that icebergs are being “hurt” by global warming.
  4. All liberals hate humans and technology, so you know they are gleefully rooting for the iceberg when they see this movie anyway.

So, to put it in psychological terms, the entire plot of the movie Titanic is a symbolic acting out of liberal hatred and revenge against the industrialized world, in which they personify the spirit of “nature” as a vengeful iceberg that destroys capitalists.

For your contemplation, we present to you a more accurate picture that shows the true subliminal message of the movie:

Liberal Ice Monster

As you can see, the iceberg is, in fact, a personification of a Liberal Monster that hates humanity.  I have added an appropriate speech bubble to indicate this fact.

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013