LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351

Liberal Bias

Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Special Sections:

Featured Bias
Featured Bias
Guest Articles
Guest Articles
Illuminated Truth
Illuminated Truth
Liberal Bias Video
Liberal Bias Video

Data proves Republicans are more in touch

Published on May 24, 2012 by in Graphs

Liberal Infographic

Just look at the blatant disgusting liberal bias in the title of the above graph: “The Dumbing Down of Congress.”

According to a recent study by the ultra-left wing communist organization “The Sunlight Foundation,”  it seems that not only has the “grade level” of speeches given by congress members decreased in recent years, but Republicans also seem to have a lower “grade level” than Democrats do.  If you buy into the radical, left-wing implications of the title, this means that congress is “dumbing down” and that Republicans are dumber (or at least, their speeches are) than Democrats.

NOTHING COULD BE FURTHUR FROM THE TRUTH!

First of all, “Dumbing” isn’t even a word.  Get a brain, morans.

Second of all, notice one important detail that the infographic fails to highlight:

Democrats speak at a 10.8 grade level
Republicans speak at a 10.4 grade level
The Average American speaks at between an 8 and 9 grade level!

In other words, Republican are closer to the Average American than Democrats are! In other words, Republicans are more in touch with the people. In other words, America is obviously a conservative country.

According to an interesting graph that can be found as part of the deeper analysis of the study, the lowest grade levels can be found among the most extremely conservative members of congress:

By Party and Seniority

This make the case even more obvious: the more extremely conservative the politician is, the more he is similar to the Average American.

THERE IS ONLY ONE CONCLUSION:  The only way to make this country a true Democracy that represents the Average American, therefore, is to only vote for the most extreme conservatives possible.

Anything else is just liberal bias!!!

graph source: Sunlight Foundation

 

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 

Do liberals actually cause global warming?

Published on May 21, 2012 by in Graphs

Biased Temperature

Liberals have been circulating the above graph to support their false and ridiculous claim that global warming exists.  It seems to show that the average temperature in the United States has been gradually increasing over the last 100 years. Luckily, we have conclusively debunked this myth in our previous articles: Ice has liberal bias! and Temperature has liberal bias!

However, in exploring the data presented in the above graph, our highly skilled investigative and research team has uncovered something even more sinister!

Suppose for a moment that the global warming depicted in the above graph is real. What is causing it? Our researchers were able to uncover extremely secret and hidden data, by using the form on the NOAA website, that demonstrates conclusively that global warming is worse in liberal states than in conservative states!

For example, in radical ultra-liberal Massachusetts, the average annual change in temperature over the last 100 years was 1.9°F:

Liberal Temperature

On the other hand, in good honest conservative Texas, where real Americans live, the average annual change in temperature over the last 100 years was only 0.2°F:

Conservative Temperature

Could it be that being liberal is actually causing global warming?

Is it possible that conservative beliefs are actually protecting conservative states from the wrath of God?

Do these data suggest that all of the complaining about global warming that liberals do is actually making it worse?

It may be impossible to know for sure… but the graphs certainly are compelling!

graph & data source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
graph found via: ThinkProgress.org

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Changes in gas prices have a liberal bias!

Published on May 17, 2012 by in Graphs

Oil Production does not reduce gas prices.

This graph has been taken from a statistical analysis performed by the Associated Press on the relationship between domestic gas production and the price of gasoline since 1976.  As you can clearly see in this graph, there is no apparent relationship between the two. In other words, this graph would have you believe that increasing domestic gas production does not cause a decrease in prices at the pump. In other words, drilling more doesn’t reduce gas prices.

THIS GRAPH IS OBVIOUSLY WRONG AND INFECTED WITH LIBERAL BIAS.

How do we know?  Consider the following irrefutable facts:

1) The Palin-Bolling plan to reduce gas prices is a very serious plan that includes several points and multiple facets. One of the facets is to increase drilling and open up lands in Anwar. Sarah Palin said this,

It is a huge unit 20 million acres was set aside for wilderness for refuge and in mid-1980 it was expanded for oil and gas development in the coastal plain the tippy top of ANWAR so we have these huge swaths of land 20 million acres in one unit and 19 million acres in another unit reservoirs that have proven to hold oil and gas that have not been tapped yet also too in addition.

Obviously this means that gas prices would decrease if we could drill more in Anwar.

2) John Boehner has patiently explained that the reason gas prices are so high is that drilling on federal lands is down. He says that if we increased federal drilling to “where it needs to be” then gas prices would drop. The news report specifically says,

Boehner will call on Obama to throw his support behind GOP-backed legislation to expand domestic oil-and-gas production, among other things. House Republicans assert that the bills will help rein in high gas prices, which are averaging $3.92 per gallon nationally.

This is very obvious: more drilling means lower gas prices.

3) Rush Limbaugh said this:

Oil is the fuel of the engine of freedom, and that’s dead-on accurate right between your eyes. That’s not spin; that’s not deception; that’s not in any way painting pictures. Oil is the fuel of the engine of freedom, and there is no replacement for it. There is no substitute for it.

That’s not really related, but gosh, isn’t it inspirational?

4) When Newt Gingrich, a true conservative, was running for President, he explained that he could easily lower gas prices by increasing drilling. He said:

$2.50 gasoline is achievable and drilling here, drilling now so we can pay less and be independent of Middle East oil is just common sense.

5) Mitt Romney spoke very clearly on the middle-of-the-road news program, Fox and Friends, where he said:

The best thing we can do to get the price of gas to be more moderate and not have to be dependent upon the cartel is: drill in the gulf, drill in the outer continent shelf, drill in ANWR, drill in North Dakota, South Dakota, drill in Oklahoma and Texas

What could be more clear? Mitt Romney is telling us that drilling more will reduce the price of gasoline at the pump.
Now I ask you this: can all of these smart, accomplished people be WRONG?

Clearly not.

The problem is, instead, with the above graph… and it’s liberal bias!!!

 

graph source: AP Gas Production And Price Analysis
data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

 
Tags: , , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

American Family Association has a LIBERAL BIAS!

Published on May 16, 2012 by in Featured

Tim Wildmon, American Family Association

We, here at the official Liberal Bias Blog, have just received an email from the radical, ultra left-wing communist organization the “American Family Association.”

Some people think that this group is conservative, because they fight against people who are homosexuals and they use the word “God” a lot.

But this is part of a devious conspiratorial liberal plot to destroy conservatism from the inside. Their goal is to infiltrate the ranks of good, honest conservatives and then inject conservatives with liberal thought-fluids and ram the liberal agenda down our throats over and over again until we submit to their aggressive liberal FORCE….

But I digress.  As you can see from the above letter, they have given themselves away.  Notice that in the greeting of this email, they have addressed us as “Whitey”.  Now why, you might ask, would they do that?

Is it because they believe, as all real conservatives do, that anybody should feel honored to be called “Whitey” because after all, white people are the ones who have accomplished everything in history?

Or, is it part of a secret plot to destroy conservatives by making them APPEAR RACIST when in fact they are nothing of the sort?

That’s right, my friends. Do not doubt me on this. Clearly this group is a left-wing plant posing as conservative in order to make real conservatives look bad.

If you were to look inside the American Family Association… and I mean deep, deep inside… yes, that’s right…. deeper…. you would probably discover that they even love taxes.

 

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

College education causes homosexual desire

Published on May 14, 2012 by in Charts

Biased College EducationsLiberals deliberately misinterpret this map to advance their liberal agenda.

This graph shows that the counties that voted against Amendment One, the amendment to protect marriage from homosexuals, were also the counties in which more people had college educations.

If you ask a liberal what this graph means, they will concoct some kind of crazy theory, like this: going to college teaches people to use logic and reason, people who use logic and reason understand that there is no rational argument against gay marriage, and as a result people who went to college support gay marriage.

Or, they will invent some irrational fantasy explanation, like this: people who go to college are exposed to more diversity, people who are exposed to diversity become more empathic and understanding of social differences, and therefore people who went to college are more sympathetic to gay people and want to let them get married.

These are the arguments of a deranged, illogical liberal mind.

First of all, who decided that “diversity” and “open-mindedness” were good things, anyway? That sounds like the kind of thing they would indoctrinate people to believe in some kind of cult. When a liberal says that “open-mindedness” is a good thing, you should just say: “Is that what your liberal college professor overlords have indoctrinated you to think?”

Think about it this way: open-mindedness means a lack of conviction, and a lack of conviction comes from a lack of morals, and a lack of morals is what causes society to collapse. In other words, open-mindedness is what causes society to collapse.

Second of all, what is so “rational” about thinking that marriage between a man and a man should be viewed the same as a marriage between a man and a woman? That’s like saying that because women can give birth a man should be able to give birth, too. THAT’S RIGHT THE ARGUMENTS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.  And ridiculous. There is nothing logical about men giving birth.

If you are thinking with a clear and untainted mind, as I am, the obvious true explanation of this map is very simple and very logical: when students go to college they are put into to top-secret liberal indoctrination camps where they are taught to be homosexual and to desire gay marriage.

I mean think about it. What else could it be?

 

 
Tags: , , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 

England has a liberal bias!

Published on May 10, 2012 by in Graphs

US vs. UK

This graph shows the impact of the Obama Recession in 2008 and 2009 on the GDP of both the United States and the United Kingdom (England). As you can see, both were hit hard by the economic collapse, and both have had only a very slight recovery.

However, you can also see that the recovery in the United States was much better than the recovery in England.

This is very weird and suspicious. England has put into place very conservative policies. They have cut back on government spending dramatically, and cut back on government regulation. All of this has been going on while Obama has gone on a wild government spending spree and increased government regulation by three million billion percent according to some sources.

So if Obama’s stimulus and socialist policies are bad for the economy, and cutting costs is supposed to help the economy to grow, then why is England not recovering faster than the United States?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU STUPID ENGLAND? WHY ARE YOU NOT RECOVERING?

I will tell you why. Liberals, who hate America, want you to believe that Obama’s stimulus and spending are what is causing our recovery to be better than the recovery in England; but nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is, Americans are just better than English people. According to the proven principle of American Exceptionalism, the U.S. economy should always recover faster than the U.K. economy. In fact, I’m sure that if it weren’t for Obama’s socialist stimulus and government regulation, that yellow line would have increased even more!

Anyone who thinks otherwise obviously just hates America, and is filled with liberal bias!!!!!

 

graph source: Thompson Reuters Datastream, April 2012
graph found via: The Rachel Maddow Show

 

 
Tags: , , , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013