LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351

Liberal Bias

Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Special Sections:

Featured Bias
Featured Bias
Guest Articles
Guest Articles
Illuminated Truth
Illuminated Truth
Liberal Bias Video
Liberal Bias Video

These are not the tax increases you are looking for

Published on July 5, 2012 by in Graphs

Liberally Biased Tax Chart

This is a truly despicable graph.  As you can see, this ranks several of the tax increases that have happened over the last 60 years or so, and measures them as a percentage of GDP.  According to these liberally biased facts, Obamacare is somewhere in the middle, whereas the Bush Tax Increases of 1980 and the Reagan Tax Increases of 1982 were both larger than the Obamacare Tax Increase.

Obviously this is impossible. These facts cannot be correct.

How do we know?

1) Obamacare is the biggest tax increase in the history of the known universe. I know this is true because Rush Limbaugh said it, and Rush Limbaugh has been documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time. I don’t really know how this was measured, but he said it once on his program so I’m sure it’s true.

2) Reagan is a paragon of conservative virtue and would never raise taxes. Anyone who says that he did is deceptively not paying attention to the time he lowered taxes, which is what they should be doing instead. Obviously.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU,  STUPID HISTORICAL TAX INCREASES? WHY ARE YOU CAUSING ALL OF THESE PROBLEMS?

There is obviously only one possible explanation. You know who some random dude in a robe suddenly “decided” that the Obamacare costs are now taxes, even though Congress previously said they were not?

Well, if they can do it, so can we: Obviously, the “Reagan Tax Increases” were fees and not taxes.  In fact, it’s pretty clear to anyone who thinks about it for a moment that all of the so-called “taxes” on the above graph that are bigger than the Obamacare increase are actually fees and not taxes.

This allows us to conclude that Reagan never raised taxes, and Obamacare is the biggest tax increase ever.

If anyone tells you anything else…. well, that’s just liberal bias!!!

 

graph data source: Data compiled by Kevin Drum
graph found via: WonkBlog

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

SPECIAL REPORT: Why did Justice Roberts switch?

Published on July 3, 2012 by in Featured

Sotomayor curses Roberts

Everyone is baffled by Chief Justice Roberts’ unexpected, last-minute flip-flop to vote with the liberals. Everybody is trying to understand how and why he changed his mind.

COULD THIS BE HOW IT HAPPENED?

As a responsible media outlet, we realize how important it is to ask the tough questions that nobody else will ask.

And trust us: nobody else is asking this!

Why not?  You already know the answer: liberal bias!!!!!

For More Information: Imperius Curse

 

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Life expectancy has a liberal bias!

Published on July 2, 2012 by in Graphs

Biased Health Care Costs

This graph has been used by liberals to deceptively suggest that there is something wrong with the United States healthcare system. According to this graph, the United States pays by far more than any other country per capita on health care, even though it is fairly low on the list for average life expectancy. Even worse, the Unites States and Cuba have almost the same average life expectancies, even though the United States pays the most per capita and Cuba pays the least!

Mark my words, now that the liberally-biased Supreme Court has upheld the anti-freedom Obamacare law, liberals will be parading around stuff like this as an argument for Obamacare.  “Look!” they will say, “Cuba is spending almost nothing and life expectancy is just as high there as it is here! We should adopt Obamacare because it is socialist and anti-freedom, just like Cuba is!”  Those will probably not be their exact words, but that will be what they really mean.

At any rate, this graph is clearly misleading in a number of ways.  First of all, “life expectancy” isn’t nearly as important as things like Freedom and Liberty.  Sure, America pays more than 10 times what Cuba pays per capita, and sure people in both countries live to be about the same age on average (77 years), but here we have LIBERTY, and in Cuba they do not. So that makes it all ok.

Plus, this graph doesn’t take into account the fact that everyone in the world is jealous of us. I don’t really know what that means, or how it can be proven or measured. But every time the topic of health care in foreign countries comes up, Rush Limbaugh makes sure to say that other countries are jealous of our system. Therefore, I know that it must be both true and relevant.

In the end, it’s clear that “life expectancy” is one of those wishy-washy, ambiguous, touchy-feely outcome measurements that doesn’t really matter.  What really matters is FREEDOM, not life expectancy, and when you put FREEDOM on a graph, you can see that America is BEST!

Anyone who says any differently is just giving you liberal bias….

 

Graph Found Via: UC Atlas of Global Inequality

 
Tags: , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

Liberals from outer space?

Published on June 28, 2012 by in Liberals

Liberal Aliens

According to the lunatic fringe left-wing Atheist gay-promoting media outlet, The Guardian, some Japanese scientists looking through a telescope in Hawaii found a galaxy that is 12.9 billion light-years away, and is therefore the “oldest galaxy” observed because supposedly if it is that far away then the light that we are seeing must have left that galaxy 12.9 billion years ago. Thus, they have given the article the title: “Oldest galaxy discovered using Hawaii telescope.”

Now, if you are a good conservative, I know what your first reactions to this will be. The universe is only 6,000 years old, so the conclusions of the article cannot be correct.  In fact, their entire argument is riddled with logical flaws. For example:

  1. Japanese scientists? These foreigners cannot be trusted. P.S. remember Pearl Harbor?
  2. A telescope in Hawaii? The place where Barack Hussein Obama is supposedly from? Clearly this data has been faked.
  3. 12.9 billion light years? Science can’t possibly measure a number that big. There must be a flaw in the theory.
  4. How do we know light always travels at the same speed? Maybe the light has been traveling for only 6,000 years, and it just goes faster most of the time and gets really slow when it comes closer to earth, probably because of the influence of Satan?

All of these are very logical, and you are right to think of them!

However, I sense a deeper problem!!!!!

It is also possible that this galaxy is actually itself a liberal!!!!!  It is therefore deliberately trying to trick Human Scientists into believing that the universe is older than it really is!

We cannot turn a blind eye to the possibility of alien, outer-space liberals. It is the kind of thing that could infect our planet and destroy us exactly because so many people brush it off as silly. Remember: Did anyone expect 9/11? NO!  And they aren’t expecting this, either.

We will be sure to keep you updated about the danger of liberal distant galaxies in outer space. In the mean time, I have added the appropriate speech bubble to the above picture to remind you of this warning.

original article: The Guardian

 

Addendum: it is noticeable that FoxNews.com does not contain an article about this!  They must be feeling guilty and repentant after their previous gaffe in reporting left-wing propaganda, which we reported on last week.

 

 
Tags: , , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 

Median family net worth has liberal bias!

Published on June 25, 2012 by in Graphs

Biased Wealth.

This graph presents this data in a very suspicious and biased way. By looking at this graph, you might get the impression that Obama’s policies have not been a disastrous war on job creators and have not been a huge burden on small businesses and people who are rich enough to call themselves “small businesses” for tax purposes.

If you look at this graph, you might come to the conclusion that the Obama recession has caused the wealth in all of the bottom 90% of income families to go down, but has caused the wealth in the top 10% of income families to actually increase. This might give you the weird impression that Obama does not have his boot on the neck of the successful. This might lead you to the erroneous conclusion that Obama has not completely annihilated the economic stability of the job-creator class. This might cause you to mistakenly suspect that Obama’s presidency hasn’t been a virtual apocalypse of businesses and successful business people.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, STUPID MEDIAN WEALTH GRAPH?

WHY ARE YOU MAKING PEOPLE THINK OBAMA HAS BEEN GOOD FOR RICH PEOPLE?

Obviously, this graph presents this data in a needlessly confusing and complex way. There is simply no reason to break down these groups by income level.  That, after all, is class warfare.  Instead, the only graph that you should look at is this one:

Unbiased Graph

This graph simply combines all of the income groups together, as God intended, and shows how the overall median has changed over time.

This graph contains all of the information you really need: things were going up until Obama became president, and then things went down. That’s all you need to know.  Any more information than that will just expose you to liberal bias!!!!

 

Graph Source Data: Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances
Graph Found Via: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

 
Tags: , , ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Australian rock art has liberal bias (+ gay animal butt sex)!

Published on June 21, 2012 by in Liberals

Liberal Rock Art

Radical left-wing communist media organization Fox News has recently reported that some scribbles on some rocks in Australia are 28,000 years old.

It is fine if they present this as a “theory” that some “scientists” have. However, if they were really a fair and balanced news organization, as they claim, they would have also presented the argument that the world is only 6,000 years old and that these rock pictures were drawn by a race of evil demons called the lamia (which are mentioned in the Bible!).  The lamia were the earliest examples of evil and therefore liberals, so it is no surprise that they would be planting fictional evidence to try to make people think that the world is older than it really is.

Gay Animal Butt Sex Rock ArtHow can we tell that these cave drawings were created by liberal demons?  Look at a close-up of this highlighted section to the left!

WHAT IS GOING ON THERE?

I’m not sure, but it sure looks anti-Family to me.

…

This entire rock picture is very suspicious, and it is clear that whenever it was made, it was drawn by liberals. I have added the appropriate speech bubble in the original picture to signify this fact.

original story: FoxNews.com

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013