LIBERAL HAZARD LEVEL
351
Enter Contact Information Here

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." 

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube Zazzle RSS

Lying graph implies that Romney would raise taxes

Misleading Romney Tax Plan Graph

If you were to believe the data in this graph, you might get the idea that Mitt Romney’s tax plan would result in an increase in taxes on middle-class and poor Americans, while only decreasing taxes for the most wealthy people in America.  Since only liberals raise taxes, doesn’t that mean that Mitt Romney is therefore a secret under-cover liberal?

Possibly. However, this graph is still very misleading for the following reasons:

1) What this graph calls “tax increases” is actually the result of Romney eliminating socialist tax-deduction programs that allowed poor people to pay lower taxes for the wrong reasons, like because they wanted to get educations or they are too poor to afford stuff. Therefore, even though the taxes on the poor people are increasing, they are not technically “tax increases” because poor lazy entitlement Kenyan socialism welfare etc.

2) The only taxes that matter are the taxes on the rich people because those are the people who create jobs. Have you ever gotten a job from a poor person? No. Therefore, the only lines that matter are the top lines, which are decreasing. The bottom lines might be increasing but that doesn’t matter because poor lazy entitlement Kenyan  socialism welfare etc.

3) Finally, notice that the lines are moving closer together. The system that Romney is moving us toward is more “fair” because “fair” is defined as everyone paying exactly the same tax rate. Some liberals might point out that a cheeseburger is 2% of the daily income of a person who is getting paid minimum wage and a cheeseburger is 0.0000000002% of the daily income of Mitt Romney, BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER. They should still both pay exactly the same tax rate. Because that’s fair. How do we know? Because we defined “fair” as “paying the same tax rate.” It’s common sense.

So do not let the above graph deceive you: what it is really telling you is that Romney’s Tax Plan will DECREASE EVERYONE’S TAXES (everyone that matters, anyway).

Anybody who tells you anything else is just spreading liberal bias!!!!

 

Graph Data Source: Tax Policy Center
Graph Found Via: The Century Foundation

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

Eating at Chik-Fil-A causes homosexuality.

Homosexual Chicken

Everyone knows homosexuality is a choice. But what makes people want to choose to be homosexual?

Answer: Eating at Chik-Fil-A.

AND WE HAVE PROOF!!!

Noted scholar and world leader Evo Morales has definitively proven that eating chicken causes male homosexuality. Why? Because chickens that are raised to be eaten are artificially injected with female hormones to make them plump and tasty.  Thus, when a male eats the hormone-filled chicken, it will cause him to deviate from normal maleness and therefore TURN INTO A HOMOSEXUAL.

This stunning revelation casts a sinister and ominous veil of suspicion over the recent events surrounding Chik-Fil-A. Everyone assumes that Chik-Fil-A is conservative and pro-Christian values.

But is it all just a liberal ruse? Are they really part of a liberal plot??

Consider the sequence of events:

1) The president to Chik-Fil-A, Dan Cathy, makes a statement that he hates the gay people.

2) This causes radical homosexual activists to protest against Chik-Fil-A.

3) This in turn lead to a counter-protest called “Chik-Fil-A Appreciation Day” where trillions and trillions of righteous conservatives bought food from Chik-Fil-A in order to show their support for family values.

Do you realize what this means?   All of those conservatives who were tricked into eating chicken at Chik-Fil-A for “Chik-Fil-A Appreciation Day” have ingested the female hormones, and thus are about to turn homosexual!

Now of course, Chik-Fil-A denies that they use the hormones in their chicken, but somehow this all seems too perfect and too suspicious.  After all, isn’t that exactly what they would say if they were illegally using hormones in their chicken?  I thought so.

They also deny being liberal, but let me ask you this: WHY would an organization manipulate public opinion in such a way as to cause trillions of people to eat chicken on the same day, and therefore turn homosexual, unless they were liberal gay activists?

The answer is clear: Chick-Fil-A is secretly part of the world-wide liberal conspiracy to turn people gay through the consumption of chicken.

Mark my words, and write down the date and time you read this, because we here at LiberalBias.com are about to make a prediction!

In the next several months or years or, you know, whenever, there will be an explosion of conservatives coming out of the closet, throwing glitter, listening to Madonna, and engaging in other unspeakable acts.  All because they participated in “Chik-Fil-A appreciation day.”

You read it here first.

 

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 

Hannity’s rubber band has a liberal bias!

Liberal Bias Rubber Band Recession.

Sean Hannity has a theory, and that theory involves rubber bands. For the last few weeks, he has been talking about the “rubber band effect“: the deeper the recession, the stronger the recovery. It is an economic fact that is always true, except when you have a foreign Kenyan socialist Muslim President who is trying to destroy America.

According to Sean Hannity, in every single past recession, the strength of the recovery was proportional to the depth of the recession.  Every recession, that is, except this one. In this recession, we had a deep recession followed by a slow weak recovery. Obviously, the fact that we had a deep recession with a weak recovery means that Obama is a communist and is trying to destroy America. We call this Sean Hannity’s Rubber
band theory.

The problem, then, is with the above graph.  According to the above graph, the deeper recessions almost always took longer to recover than the shallow ones.  The 1958 recession was deeper and took longer to recover than the 1953 recession. The 1953 recession was deeper and took longer to recover than the 1960 recession. The 1960 recession was deeper and took longer to recover than the 1969 recession.  And the 1969 recession was deeper and took longer to recover than the 1980 recession.

SO WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, STUPID RECESSION GRAPH?

HOW COME YOU DON’T LOOK LIKE SEAN HANNITY’S RUBBER
BAND THEORY?

Clearly, if this graph is contradicting Sean Hannity’s rubber
band theory, it must be filled with liberal bias!!!

 

Graph Found Via: CalculatedRiskBlog.com

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Google has a liberal bias!

Liberally Biased GoogleFor a long time, many people have been reporting on the liberal bias of Google.  Consider all of this damning evidence: 1) Last memorial day, the flag that Google displayed was TOO SMALL, 2) Google once employed a guy who was personally opposed to the uprising in Egypt, which everyone knows was bad, 3) some guy once had a conservative website that didn’t show up in Google search, 4) they sometimes pull conservative things from Youtube, and 5) their search results sometimes return websites that say good things about Barack Aboma.

As if that were not proof enough, look at today’s Google Doodle, celebrating the 2012 Olympics….

LOOK AT THIS DISGUSTING DOODLE!

LOOK AT HIS MUSTACHE!

French and GayAs a proud conservative American, I have to ask this: why is the Olympic gymnast celebrated by an American company so blatantly French!?!?!?

Shouldn’t Google be showing pride in this country, and showing a fine outstanding American Olympic gymnast? Is this a sign that Google is secretly in love with France, where they have something like 200% taxes on the rich and hate puppies?

This is the last straw.  You must STOP using Google immediately, so that you do not support their French-loving, communist, anti-family, pro-mustache agenda.

Instead, you should use this conservative search page that allows you search from alternative modern and up-to-date engines like “Alta Vista” and “Lycos”.  They also let you search the Bible.

And as long as you can search the Bible…. who really needs Google, anyway?

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
4 Comments  comments 

Did Reagan cut the U.S. murder rate in half?

Published on July 30, 2012 by in Graphs

Reagan Fixes Everything

The original version of this graph was found on some pointless blog as part of an article entitled “America is a violent country.”  Typical liberal nonsense.  It figures that a liberal would look at this graph, and focus only on the fact that America has a teeny, tiny bit more violence than other industrialized nations. Focusing on such a trivial detail is a clear example of liberal bias!!!

What they don’t notice is this: Ever since Ronald Reagan was elected President, deaths due to assault have been steadily decreasing!

Is this because of the benevolent influence of Ronald Reagan’s conservative soul protecting us?

Is this because  God is rewarding us for making the wise decision to make Ronald Reagan our inspiration and leader?

Is this because the echoes of his immense and powerful impact on the American psyche has made us all better people?

And most importantly: Why aren’t Fox News and other members of the Mainstream Media asking these important questions?

graph data source: OECD
graph found via: crookedtimber.org

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 

Cumulative CO2 emissions have a liberal bias!

Published on July 26, 2012 by in Graphs

Biased Emissions Graph

This un-American graph is a perfect example of the kind of sick deception that liberals engage in. Found on some lunatic-fringe, unknown liberal website called “ABC News“, which obviously has no credibility, this graph seems to suggest that when you look at the cumulative CO2 emissions over the last quarter century, the United States is responsible for the largest part of these emissions!

Now, everyone knows that global warming is a myth and that CO2 is a very natural and good substance that God loves. But let’s get one thing straight…

Even if….

Now, remember: global warming is 100% FALSE.

But…. EVEN IF, through some weird freakish impossible turn of events, it turned out that global warming IS happening….

In other words….

EVEN IF, hypothetically, global warming turned out, somehow, against all odds, to be true…

…then it certainty wasn’t AMERICA’S FAULT!  Duh!

In fact, our in-depth research and flawless instincts allow us, here at LiberalBias.com, to make the following prediction:

If, at some point in the future, Global Warming starts to happen, it will because of all of the communism going on in China, and will not be because of the virtuous liberty and freedom that is emitted in carbon form from U.S. coal plants.

For evidence, we have this chart:

America Rules!

This chart clearly shows that recently, China has been producing emissions at the highest rate in the world.  Therefore, in much the same way that Obama is responsible for the ENTIRE national debt now that he is president, it is only logical that right now China is responsible for ALL emissions-related global warming problems.

I mean… if they existed.

Which they don’t.

Anyway, the point is that you should only pay attention to the second graph, above, because the first one is just filled with liberal bias!!!!!

 

 Graphs found via: ABCNews Technology Blog

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 

© LiberalBias.com 2011-2013