There are two sides to every story, and one of them is socialist.

Conservative Graph

When science says that Fox News is biased, there is only one obvious and correct response: “Nuh uh… you are!”

Liberals like to make fun of conservatives for being “anti-science” and unfortunately a lot of conservatives fall for this trick, and get all squeamish and apologize or deny that they are anti-science. The fact is, if you are a real conservative, you should stand up and be proudly anti-science.

Science explicitly and unashamedly does not take values into consideration when evaluating theories. Science is tyrannical about rejecting theories that do not fit data, no matter how much those theories might make intuitive sense or be based on moral wisdom. Science is elitist and scoffs at anything that it doesn’t consider “real data”. Why can’t Christian Values also be considered data, huh? Stupid tyrannical scientists.

There is no reason to think that being anti-Science is a bad thing. The only reason people in our society have been brainwashed into accepting that science is good is because of the moral decay and insidious propaganda of the left wing.

According to science, when there are two sides to a story, one of them is right and the other is wrong.

According to conservatives, when there are two sides to a story, one of them is Right and the other is socialist!

And that is why science itself has a permanent and unavoidable liberal bias!!!


graph found via: (altered by to remove all the bias)

Sean Hannity gets his ass kicked by a girl

Liberal Nielsen Viewers

Well, this is embarrassing. Sean Hannity, who repeatedly brags about the size of his, you know…. audience… was beaten in his prime time television slot in the 25-54 age demographic by a girl. And not just any girl: by a homo-sexual liberal girl!

The last time this happened, back in August, the left-wing mainstream media was rife with sick sexual innuendo that called Hannity’s masculinity into question. Isn’t it just like liberals to think that everything has to do with sex? What kind of disgusting headline is that? “Rachel Maddow Tops Sean Hannity“… we all know what that means, you liberal sickos.

Anyway, this past Monday it happened again.  At 9pm, Rachel Maddow had 31% more viewers than Sean Hannity.  How is this even possible?



……OK, maybe that’s not the right question…. but you know what we mean.


Luckily, there is a silver lining: although Maddow beat Hannity in the 25-54 year olds segment, Hannity still solidly beat Maddow in total viewers. So at least really, really young people and/or really, really old people can be depended on to be free from all of the liberal bias!!!!


graph data source: Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data
graph found via: