Obama is a failed president

President Obama’s approval rating has tanked to a deplorable 40%, which clearly indicates that he is a completely failed President.

This is an indisputable fact. This 40% approval rating means he is a COMPLETELY FAILED PRESIDENT.

In the spirit of completeness, however, we are duty-bound to admit that Obama is not the first completely failed President. In fact, if reaching 40% approval or less is the sign of a completely failed president, then we have the following collection of past presidents who were all complete and utter failures…. every one:

George W. Bush became a complete failure in 2005 and remained a total failure from 2006 on.

Bill Clinton became an utter failure in 1993.

George H.W. Bush failed completely, starting in 1992.

Ronald Reagen attained the status of totally failed President in 1983.

Jimmy Carter was an utter failure as President from 1979 on.

Ford achieved the status of “total failure” in 1975, and Nixon in 1973, and LBJ was a totally failed President in 1967.

In fact, the last President of the United States to not be a complete, utter, and total failure was John F. Kennedy.


Now, I don’t want you to think that any of this should be understood to imply that a 40% approval rating is a completely arbitrary, stupid, and ridiculous cut-off mark for considering someone a “failed President”.

We wouldn’t want you to think that.

Instead, just think about the fact that every single President in the last 50 years has been just as much of a failure as President Obama.

Obviously the liberals must be to blame.

Obama is a failed president


POLL RESULT: the public blames Obama for the sequester!

Obama takes the blame!Every day this week, talk show hosts and radio commentators have been saying that the public blames Obama for the sequester. They are obviously referring to the above poll results.

Consider these headlines:

Obama poll numbers take a post-sequester dive

Sequester Blowback: Obama Plummets to 43%

Poll: Obama’s Not Winning The Sequester Fight

Obama Suddenly Not Winning the Sequester Fight

Poll: Obama approval drops seven points on sequester worries



Holy Cow! Just look at those headlines! It’s almost as if the poll didn’t even ASK the corresponding question about the approval rating for Republicans in Congress.

…and naturally, we would have preferred it if they hadn’t.

This is why we have added some small highlighting arrows to the above graph, to make sure that you are looking at the correct part of the graph, and do not succumb to liberal bias!!!


graph data source: ABC News/Washington Post poll
graph found via: Langer Research

Poll sampling has a liberal bias!

Graph of Bias.

The above graph does not have liberal bias. Quite the opposite: it suggests a brilliant way to fix the liberal bias that can usually be found everywhere in facts, statistics, and data in general.

This graph, produced by a very credible anonymous person on the internet who uses the nickname “NumbersCruncher” who posted it on Twitter and then had it later published on the extremely reliable news source The Blaze, clearly shows that most of the election polls suffer from a “sample advantage” of Democrats over Republicans.

What does “sample advantage” mean? It means that they polled more Democrats than Republicans.  As you can see, every poll except Rasmussen sampled more than 4% more Democrats than Republicans, and every poll except Rasmussen shows Obama having an advantage. The conclusion is obvious: the only reason these polls show and advantage for Obama is that they surveyed more Democrats than Republicans!

Now, the people who do the polls might say something like this: Consistently, likely voters have actually consisted of 3% more self-described Democrats than Republicans, and in the last presidential election the voting population actually was made up of 7% more Democrats than Republicans. Therefore, our survey sample simply reflects the statistical reality of the make-up of the voting population.

But that’s stupid.

Obviously, the only way to have a fair and unbiased survey is to poll half of the people on one side, and half of the people on the other. I mean, that’s just common sense. When there are two sides, the fair thing to do is to survey half from one group and half from the other. Fair means both sides are equal. Nothing could be more obvious. Check your gut feelings: doesn’t that seem fair?

Therefore, we propose that the genius method suggested by this anonymous internet person in the above graph actually be applied even more widely.  For example:

To determine whether global warming is true, survey 100 climate change supporters and 100 climate change deniers.

To determine whether evolution is true, survey 100 evolutionists and 100 creationists.

To determine whether English should be the national language, survey 100 people who believe that English should be the national language and 100 people who think it should not.

Quite plainly, this is the best way to get good, conservative statistical results.

Anything else would just be liberal bias!!!!


Graph Data Source: who knows? some anonymous person made it and posted it on Twitter. That’s how we know it’s true.
Graph Found Via:



Terrorism has a liberal bias!

Liberal Terrorism Approval

I know this is a very controversial topic for some people. Ultra-left-wing loons always tell us that it is just completely wrong and over-the-top to draw any connection between liberals and terrorists. They call it destructive, hysterical, blah blah blah, and all that noise.

BUT IS IT??????

Let’s look at the numbers.  When the Washington Post asked people to rate Obama’s performance on a number of issues, the results of the poll clearly showed his incompetence on every issue… except one! Notice that there is only one topic where more people said “strongly approve” than “strongly disapprove”, and that is the way Obama has has handled the threat of terrorism.


Yes, it is. Obviously, if an incompetent liberal president can “do well” dealing with terrorism, then terrorism must be in on it. They are conspiring to make this failed president look good, and thus was are forced to conclude logically, based on these factual numbers, that terrorism has a liberal bias!!!!

source: The Washington Post

The word “approval” has liberal bias!

Approval has liberal bias

How is it possible that the WORST President in history (Barrack Obama) and the BEST President in history (Ronald Reagan) have had almost identical approval ratings for the first 1000 days of their term? Especially when it is so obvious that everybody hates Obama!?

Well, after much consideration we have determined that the problem must be in the way the survey is asked.  That’s right, the actual word “approval” must have a liberal bias!!!!

Source: Gallup Polling Organization Data
Via: USA Today